|
Chapter Ten: Conflict Management in Groups
Summary of conflict solution discussed in this book
Sources
|
Solutions
|
Competitive group climate
|
Structure cooperating group climate
|
Defensive communication patterns
|
Structure supportive communications
|
Self-centered disruptive roles
|
Adopt strategies for dealing with difficult members
|
Imbalance of power
|
Balance power among group members
|
Conflicts of interest
|
Use integrative problem solving
|
Conflict- is the expressed struggle of interconnected parties who perceive incompatible goals and interference form each other in attaining those goals.
Destructive versus constructive conflict
Destructive conflict is characterized by domination, escalation, retaliation, competitions, and inflexibility. When conflict spirals out of control it is destructive.
 Participants lose sight of their initial goals and focus on hurting the adversary.
Constructive conflict is characterized by a We-orientation, cooperation, and flexibility. The principal focus is on trying to achieve a solution between struggling parties that is mutually satisfactory to everyone.
Conflict resolution versus management
Resolution suggests settling conflict or terminating the struggle, as if ending the conflict by any means is desirable.
Management implies no end to the struggle. Management of conflict implies no judgment on the goodness or badness of struggles in general.
Styles of Conflict Management
Style
|
Characteristics
|
Task-Social Dimension
|
Collaborating (problem solving)
|
Win-win. Cooperative approach to conflict.
Attempts to satisfy all parties
Three components:
Confrontation: Bring the conflict out into the open
Integration: -looking at many options until both parties are satisfied.
Smoothing-smooth out ruffled feathers.
|
High task, high social
|
Accommodating (yielding)
|
This style may camouflage deep division among group members in order to maintain the appearance of harmony.
|
Low task, high social
|
Compromising
|
 Lower our expectations and goals. We give up in order to get something.
 Lose-lose style because neither party is ever fully satisfied.
|
Moderate task, moderate social
|
Avoiding (withdrawing)
|
 Flights from fights.
 By avoiding they hope the conflict will disappear.
 May, in some cases be good in abuse situations
|
Low task, low social
|
Competing (Power/ Forcing)
|
Forcing your will on others is a win-lose style
Groups tend to ascribe blame when groups don't function properly.
|
High task, low social
|
 Studies show that collaborating and accommodating were more successful methods for managing conflict than were competing and avoiding.
 Phillips and Cheston compared collaborative problem solving and power forcing styles in 52 conflict cases. Forcing was used twice as often as problem solving, yet in about half the situations where forcing was used the outcomes were good.
 Only 5% of top managers, first line supervisors, and middle managers admitted to actually using the collaborative style in specific conflict situations. 41% selected competing and 26% chose avoiding.
Focus on Culture: Culture and Conflict Styles
Low context style
|
High context style
|
message-content orientation
|
message-context orientation
|
The listener knows very little and must be told practically everything
|
The listener is already contexted and does not need to be given much background information
|
Verbally precise, direct, literal, explicit.
|
Indirect verbal expressions. You are expected to read between the lines.
|
Favor direct competition or compromising styles of conflict management
|
Avoiding or accommodating styles of conflict management.
|
US, England
|
China,
|
People need to change their perspectives,
not their problems
-John Maxwell
Transacting Conflict
Nature of conflict
 Is it a content or relationship issue?
 How deeply held are the beliefs and values?
 Most difficult disputes to manage are value conflicts.
 When the conflict is a power struggle, the choice of styles will depend on the relative power relationships between the parties involved.
Nature of the relationship
 Managers typically handle conflict with superiors and peers differently.
 Power-forcing is the most common style managers use in handling different items with subordinates.
 Managers are primarily accommodating with superiors and compromising with peers.
Timing
Hit and run confrontations look like guerilla tactics, not attempts to communicate competently and work out disputes.
 Confrontation can be highly effective but not when the other person is not given time to respond such as in hit and run.
Conflict spirals
 Minor conflicts can easily escalate into major destructive conflict spiraling out of control when groups are faced with failure, poor working conditions, intense competitions, stress, or a defensive climate.
Negative reciprocation- those who do harm to us or threaten our well-being are though to deserve harm or threats in return.
 To avoid this spirals, you must not match the abusive, insulting, or threatening behavior of other group members.
The Ten Commandments of Confrontation
 Do it privately; not publicly
 Do it as soon as possible. That is more natural than waiting a long time.
 Speak to one issue at a time. Don't overload the person with a long list of issues.
 Once you've made a point, don't keep repeating it.
 Deal only with actions the person can change. If you ask the person to do something he or she is unable to do, frustration builds in your relationship.
 Avoid sarcasm. Sarcasm signals that you are angry at people, not their actions, and may cause them to resent you.
 Avoid word like always and never. They usually detract from accuracy and make people defensive.
 Present criticisms as suggestions or questions if possible.
 Don't apologize for the confrontational meeting. Doing so detracts from it and may indicate you are not sure you had the right to do what you did.
 Don't forget the compliments. Use what I call the "sandwich" in these types of meetings.
 Compliment--Confront--Compliment
by John Maxwell from Developing the Leader Within You
Closer Look: KILL Radio Conflict Case Study
(Live radio that'll knock you dead)
Negotiating strategies
Negotiation is a process by which a joint decision is made by two or more parties.
Tit for tat-
 Eye for an eye a smooch for a smooch.
 You begin by cooperating, but if they compete you compete.
 Since negative reciprocation is more likely than positive reciprocation, a spiral of competitive tit for tat is the usual pattern among group members.
 It is an incompetent strategy when you look at its negative sequences of potential moves and countermoves.
 There is the likelihood of an endless "malignant spiral" (spiral of great harm) of escalating competitive behavior.
Reformed sinner
 Initially competed or acts tough, then cooperates and relaxes demands.
 You try to break the conflict spiral by making the first move toward cooperation.
One version is the GRIT proposal
Graduated and Reciprocated Initiatives in Tension Reduction
Originally offered a a means to de-escalate the international arms race
1. Issue a sincere public statement expressing a desire to de-escalate the conflict
2. Specify the concession to be made, clarifying what, when, and how the action will be undertaken.
3. Follow through and complete the concession, but do not make this contingent on reciprocation by the other parties
4. Encourage, but do not demand, reciprocation from the other parties
5. Make no high-risk concessions that leave you vulnerable or in an indefensible position. Don't give away the store.
Positional bargaining
Parties take positions on contested issues, then haggle back and forth until concessions are made and an agreement is reached
Hard bargainers -tough bargainers see a negotiation as a contest of wills.
 Hard bargaining is it the negotiations strategy from strength approach.
 The focus is on conveying strength and resilience so the other parties will yield.
 The key is to appear tough but fair.
 To Soft bargainers making an agreement and remaining friends is more important than winning a victory.
Principled negotiation
 Interested bargaining: Principled negotiation embodies the essential elements of competent communication.
 All negotiations are conducted according to rules.
 Principled negotiation changes the rules Separate the from competitive, hard bargaining, to cooperative.
 The four basic elements to this approach are
 People: Separate the people from the problem
 Interests: Focus on interests, not positions
 Options: Generate a variety of possibilities before deciding what to do.
 Criteria: Insist that the result be bases on some objective standard.
Develop a BATNA
Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement.
 Make choices and take only those actions that benefit both you and other parties in the dispute regardless of whether the other parties reciprocate.
 You need to develop a BATNA as a standard against which any proposal can be measures.
The size of the person is more important than the size of the problem-
John Maxwell
Anger Management
Managing your own anger
Reframe self-talk-Reframing the way we think about things can deflate our anger before it escalates
Listen non-defensively- refuse to be defensive
Deliberately calm yourself. Typically it takes about 20 minutes to recover from a surge of adrenaline that accompanies anger. A cooling-off period may be necessary.
Find distractions- don't rehearse you anger.
Managing the anger of others
Be asymmetrical- Do not strike back at someone's anger with your anger. Counter rage with calm
Validate the other person- Let the other person know that their point of view has some validity
Probe- Seek information so you can understand the other person's anger.
Assume a problem orientation- Approach the anger display a a problem to be solved.
Refuse to be abused-Do not permit yourself to be verbally battered.
Disengage-Adjourn to another time.
Misery is an Option- John Maxwell
\
|